1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 844 N.E.2d
  5. 844 N.E.2d 923 (2006)
 

PERLSTEIN v. WOLK

No. 98909.

844 N.E.2d 923 (2006)

218 Ill.2d 448

300 Ill.Dec. 480

Deena PERLSTEIN et al., Appellees, v. Maurice WOLK et al., Appellants.

Supreme Court of Illinois.

February 17, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gino L. DiVito and Daniel I. Konieczny, of Tabet, DiVito & Rothstein, L.L.C., Chicago, for appellants.

Thomas W. Gooch III and Melissa G. Massey, Wauconda, for appellees.

Justice FITZGERALD delivered the judgment of the court, with opinion:

Plaintiffs Deena Perlstein and Scott Schneider filed a legal malpractice action against defendants Maurice Wolk and Ross & Hardies. Plaintiffs relied on the limitations period for malpractice actions set forth in section 13-214.3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, as amended by Public Act 89-7 (commonly referred to as the Tort Reform Act). See Pub. Act 89-7, eff. March 9, 1995 (amending, inter...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases