1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 442 F.3d
  5. 442 F.3d 1301 (2006)
 

EXIGENT TECHNOLOGY, INC. v. ATRANA SOLUTIONS, INC.

No. 05-1338.

442 F.3d 1301 (2006)

EXIGENT TECHNOLOGY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ATRANA SOLUTIONS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

March 22, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Matthew C. Wagner, Collen IP Intellectual Property Law, P.C., of Ossining, New York, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Jeffrey A. Lindenbaurn.

William M. Lee, Jr., Barnes & Thornburg LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were Peter J. Shakula and John P. Wappel. Of counsel on the brief was Jonathan D. Plotkin, Atrana Solutions, Inc., of Dallas, Texas.

Before GAJARSA, DYK, and PROST, Circuit Judges.

DYK, Circuit Judge.

Exigent Technology, Inc. ("Exigent") appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment of non-infringement to Atrana Solutions, Inc. ("Atrana"), its denial, as moot, of Exigent's motion to vacate the grant of summary judgment and enforce an alleged settlement agreement, and its grant of attorney fees and costs. We conclude that the district court properly found no genuine issue of material fact concerning infringement and properly rejected...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases