1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 902 A.2d
  5. 902 A.2d 838 (2006)
 

CREAMER v. BISHOP

902 A.2d 838 (2006)

2006 ME 95

Paul CREAMER v. Edward BISHOP et al.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.

Decided: August 2, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen C. Chute, Esq., Carey & Associates, Rumford, for the appellant.

Neil Shankman, Esq., David J. Van Baars, Esq., Shankman & Associates, Lewiston, for the appellee.

Panel: SAUFLEY, C.J., and DANA, ALEXANDER, CALKINS, LEVY, and SILVER, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

[¶ 1] Paul Creamer appeals from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Oxford County, Crowley, J.) granting Camelot Homes Center and Camelot Homes, Inc.'s1 (Camelot) motion to compel arbitration. Creamer contends that the dispute is not subject to arbitration because the arbitration clause in the purchase and sale contract does not apply to the subject matter of his complaint.

[¶ 2] As we have previously...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases