1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 934 So.2d
  5. 934 So.2d 779 (2006)
 

ELLIOTT v. AMATO AND CREELY

No. 2005 CA 0376.

934 So.2d 779 (2006)

Howard P. ELLIOTT, Jr. v. AMATO AND CREELY, a Professional Law Corporation, and Madro Bandaries.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.

March 29, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul H. Spaht, Kantrow, Spaht, Weaver & Blitzer, Baton Rouge, for Plaintiff-Appellee Howard P. Elliott, Jr.

Anna E. Dow, Baton Rouge, Madro Bandaries, Gretna, for Defendants-Appellants Amato & Creely, APLC, and Madro Bandaries.

Before: PARRO, McDONALD, and HUGHES, JJ.

PARRO, J.

In this declaratory judgment action regarding disputed attorney fees, the defendants, Amato and Creely, A Professional Law Corporation (Amato), and Madro Bandaries (Bandaries), appeal a judgment overruling their declinatory exception raising the objection of improper venue. We affirm the judgment.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Howard P. Elliott, Jr., a Baton Rouge attorney, filed suit in the Nineteenth Judicial District Court in East...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases