WALSH v. CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU

No. CV 05-00378 DAE LEK.

460 F.Supp.2d 1207 (2006)

Kevin R. WALSH and Blane M. Wilson, Steven M. Annarelli, and Lydia R. Hill, as individuals and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU, a Hawaii municipal corporation; Mark J. Bennett, Attorney General of the State of Hawaii, in his official capacity; and Marie Laderta, Interim Director, State of Hawaii Department of Human Resources Development, in her official capacity, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Hawai`i.

July 3, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charleen M. Aina, Office of the Attorney General — Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, for Mark J. Bennett, Kathleen N.A. Watanabe, Marie Laderta, Defendants.

Mark J. Bennett, Office of the Attorney General-Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, for City and County of Honolulu, Marie Laderta, Mark J. Bennett, Defendants.

James Earl Halvorson, Office of the Attorney General-Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, for Mark J. Bennett, Kathleen N.A. Watanabe, Marie Laderta, Defendants.

Michael K. Livingston, Davis Levin Livingston Grande, Honolulu, HI, for Kevin R. Walsh, Blane M. Wilson, Lydia R. Hill, Steven M. Annarelli, Plaintiffs.

Deirdre Marie — Iha, Office of the Attorney General-Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, for Mark J. Bennett, Kathleen N.A. Watanabe, Marie Laderta, City and County of Honolulu, Defendants.

Gordon D. Nelson, Office of Corporation Counsel-Honolulu, Honolulu, HI, for City and County of Honolulu, Defendant.

Lois K. Perrin, American Civil Liberties Union of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, for Kevin R. Walsh, Blane M. Wilson, Lydia R. Hill, Steven M. Annarelli, Plaintiffs.

Richard H. Thomason, Office of the Attorney General-Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, for Mark J. Bennett, Kathleen N.A. Watanabe, Marie Laderta, Defendants.

Anne L. Williams, Davis Levin Livingston Grande, Honolulu, HI, for Kevin R. Walsh, Blane M. Wilson, Lydia R. Hill, Steven M. Annarelli, Plaintiffs.

Donna M. Woo, Office of Corporation Counsel-Honolulu, Honolulu, HI, for City and County of Honolulu, Defendant.


AMENDED ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING DEFENDANTS' COUNTER MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

DAVID ALAN EZRA, District Judge.

Pursuant to Local Rule 7.2(d), the Court finds this matter suitable for disposition without a hearing. After reviewing Plaintiffs' Motion and the supporting and opposing memoranda, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment and Permanent Injunction.

BACKGROUND

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases