PER CURIAM.
Edward Gibson appeals the striking of his rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. The circuit court struck the motion because an appeal from the denial of Gibson's unrelated rule 3.800(a) motion was pending with this court. However, the trial court had jurisdiction to entertain the unrelated rule 3.850 motion. See Newberry v. State,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.