1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 897 A.2d
  5. 897 A.2d 733 (2006)
 

STATE v. ROY D.

No. 26218.

897 A.2d 733 (2006)

95 Conn.App. 686

STATE of Connecticut v. ROY D.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Decided May 30, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael Zariphes, special public defender, for the appellant (defendant).

Michele C. Lukban, senior assistant state's attorney, with whom, on the brief, were Matthew C. Gedansky, state's attorney, and Elizabeth C. Learning, assistant state's attorney, for the appellee (state).

BISHOP, DiPENTIMA and FOTI, Js.

BISHOP, J.

The defendant, Roy D., appeals from the judgments of the trial court revoking his probation pursuant to General Statutes § 53a-32. On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the court imposed an unauthorized condition of probation and (2) he did not have notice that failure to admit to his offenses while undergoing sex offender treatment could lead to the revocation of his probation. We affirm the judgments of the trial court.

The following facts...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases