ECHEVERRI v. BLAKELY


893 A.2d 730 (2006)

384 N.J. Super. 10

Jose ECHEVERRI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William L. BLAKELY, Defendant-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 14, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ana P. Esteves, Newark, argued the cause for appellant (Frank D. Angelastro, attorney; Ms. Esteves, on the brief).

Robert F. Cox, Cranford, argued the cause for respondent (McCreedy & Cox, attorneys; Mr. Cox, on the brief).

Before Judges STERN, PARKER and MINIMAN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by

MINIMAN, J.S.C. (temporarily assigned).

This is an appeal from a grant of summary judgment in favor of defendant William L. Blakely dismissing the complaint of plaintiff Jose Echeverri for failure to prove a permanent injury under the Automobile Insurance Cost Reduction Act of 1998 (AICRA), N.J.S.A. 39:6A-1.1 to -35. Echeverri does not contest the trial court's conclusion that his injuries did not satisfy the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases