SEDLOCK v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES

No. 3-05-0736.

854 N.E.2d 748 (2006)

Daniel J. SEDLOCK, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. The BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF the POLICE PENSION FUND OF the CITY OF OTTAWA, Respondent-Appellee.

Appellate Court of Illinois, Third District.

August 22, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter F. Ferracuti, Law Offices of Peter F. Ferracuti, P.C., Ottawa, Jennifer Kieseweter (argued), for Daniel J. Sedlock.

James L. Dobrovolny (argued), Dobrovolny Law Offices, Urbana, for City of Ottawa Police Pension Fund.


Presiding Justice SCHMIDT delivered the opinion of the court:

This is an appeal of the trial court's dismissal of petitioner Daniel Sedlock's complaint for declaratory judgment. Sedlock asked the circuit court of La Salle County to declare that the Board of Trustees of the Police Pension Fund of the City of Ottawa (PPF) does not have the authority to make a final salary determination for Sedlock in any sum other than $84...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases