1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 717 N.W.2d
  5. 717 N.W.2d 878 (2006)
 

TINGLEY v. WARDROP

Docket Nos. 128901, 128907, 128909. COA No. 243171.

717 N.W.2d 878 (2006)

William Q. TINGLEY, III, William Q. Tingley, and Daniel R. Bradley, Plaintiffs-Appellees, and Proto-Cam, Inc., Bend Tooling, Inc., and Tennine Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. Robert F. WARDROP, II, William J. Fisher III, Todd R. Dickinson, Wardrop & Wardrop, P.C., Dickinson Wright, PLLC, Fisher & Dickinson, P.C., 900 Monroe LLC, 940 Monroe LLC, Pioneer Incorporated, Dykema Excavators, Inc., and Fifth Third Bancorp, Defendants, and City of Grand Rapids and John H. Logie, Defendants-Appellants. William Q. Tingley, III, William Q. Tingley, and Daniel R. Bradley, Plaintiffs-Appellees, and Proto-Cam, Inc., Bend Tooling, Inc., and Tennine Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. Robert F. Wardrop, II, William J. Fisher III, Todd R. Dickinson, Wardrop & Wardrop, P.C., Dickinson Wright, PLLC, Fisher & Dickinson, P.C., Dykema Excavators, Inc., Fifth Third Bancorp, City of Grand Rapids, and John H. Logie, Defendants, and 900 Monroe LLC, 940 Monroe LLC, and Pioneer Incorporated, Defendants-Appellants. William Q. Tingley, III, William Q. Tingley, and Daniel R. Bradley, Plaintiffs-Appellees, and Proto-Cam, Inc., Bend Tooling, Inc., and Tennine Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. Robert F. Wardrop, II, William J. Fisher III, Todd R. Dickinson, Wardrop & Wardrop, P.C., Dickinson Wright, PLLC, Fisher & Dickinson, P.C., 900 Monroe LLC, 940 Monroe LLC, Pioneer Incorporated, City of Grand Rapids, John H. Logie, and Fifth Third Bancorp, Defendants, and Dykema Excavators, Inc., Defendant-Appellant.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

July 31, 2006.

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court's order of April 7, 2006 is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

MICHAEL F. CAVANAGH and MARILYN J. KELLY, JJ., would grant the motion for reconsideration.

WEAVER, J., dissents and states as follows:

For the reasons stated in my dissent to the order in this matter which issued April 7, 2006, I would grant reconsideration and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases