VIDAL v. MACKSOUD

No. 3D05-1522.

933 So.2d 659 (2006)

Arturo VIDAL and Hoida Vidal, his wife, Appellant, v. Delores MACKSOUD, M.D. and Delores Macksoud, M.D., P.A., et al., Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

July 12, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hommer Bonner and Douglas F. Eaton, Miami, for appellant.

Wicker, Smith, O'Hara, McCoy, Graham & Ford, P.A. and Shelley H. Leinicke, Ft. Lauderdale, for appellee.

Before GREEN, FLETCHER, and RAMIREZ, JJ.


GREEN, J.

Arturo Vidal, and his wife, Hoida, sued Delores Macksoud, M.D., and Delores Macksoud, M.D., P.A. (collectively "Dr. Macksoud") for medical malpractice. A jury returned a verdict in their favor for $124,800 but assessed fifty percent (50%) comparative negligence to Arturo Vidal. The trial court entered a final judgment in accordance with the jury's findings, which prompted this appeal. The Vidals solely assert that the comparative negligence cannot stand...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases