1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 435 F.3d
  5. 435 F.3d 1147 (2006)
 

U.S. v. LADWIG

No. 04-30393.

435 F.3d 1147 (2006)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Craig Allen LADWIG, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

January 27, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephanie J. Lister, Esq., USSP—Office of the U.S. Attorney, Spokane, WA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Christina L. Hunt, Esq., FPDWA — Federal Public Defender's Office, Spokane, WA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before GOULD and BERZON, Circuit Judges, and SCHWARZER, District Judge.

ORDER

In our opinion of December 27, 2005, we retained jurisdiction and directed the parties to provide supplemental briefing on whether either wished to pursue a limited remand under United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). Because both parties have responded that they do not seek an Ameline remand, and other sentencing issues were resolved in our prior opinion, we now AFFIRM Ladwig's sentence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases