NOSKE v. FRIEDBERG

No. A05-1160.

713 N.W.2d 866 (2006)

James L. NOSKE, Appellant, v. Joseph S. FRIEDBERG, et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

April 25, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lawrence H. Crosby, Jay D. Olson, Crosby & Associates, St. Paul, MN, for appellant.

Paul C. Peterson, William L. Davidson, Lind, Jensen, Sullivan & Peterson, P.A., Minneapolis, MN, for respondents.

Considered and decided by WRIGHT, Presiding Judge; DIETZEN, Judge; and WORKE, Judge.


OPINION

DIETZEN, Judge.

Appellant James Noske challenges the district court's grant of summary judgment dismissing his legal-malpractice claim, arguing that genuine issues of material fact remain for trial. By notice of review, respondents Joseph Friedberg and Joseph S. Friedberg, Chartered, argue that the district court erred by not dismissing appellant's claim for failure to submit a proper affidavit of expert review. Because we conclude that (1) appellant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases