U.S. v. MUSAL

No. 4:02-CV-40449-JEG.

421 F.Supp.2d 1153 (2006)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Richard MUSAL, Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. Iowa, Central Division.

January 25, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harold N. Schneebeck, Jr., Brown Winick Graves Gross Baskerville & Schoenebaum PLC, West Des Moines, IA, for Plaintiff.

Anne Norris Graham, USDOJ Tax Division, Laquita Taylor Phillips, US Dept of Justice, Washington, DC, for Defendant.


ORDER

GRITZNER, District Judge.

Before the Court is Defendant Richard Musal's Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law and Motion for a New Trial, which the Government resists. Neither party has requested a hearing, and the Court finds that a hearing is unnecessary. For the reasons discussed below, Musal's motions must be denied.

SUMMARY OF MATERIAL FACTS

Access Air, Inc. ("Access Air"), was a corporation that provided commercial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases