OPINION OF THE COURT
Per Curiam.
The petitioner served the respondent with a petition dated January 14, 2005, containing four charges of professional misconduct. After a hearing on September 27, 2005, and September 29, 2005, the Special Referee sustained all four charges. The petitioner moves to confirm the Special Referee's report and to impose such discipline upon the respondent as the Court deems just and proper. The respondent cross-moves to disaffirm...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.