ROBERT v. SCARLATA

No. 26691.

899 A.2d 666 (2006)

96 Conn.App. 19

Paul ROBERT v. Carmen SCARLATA et al.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Decided June 13, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul Robert, pro se, the appellant (plaintiff).

Jonathan A. Kaplan, with whom was Donald E. Weisman, Hartford, for the appellees (defendants).

FLYNN, C.J., and ROGERS and HENNESSY, Js.


FLYNN, C.J.

The pro se plaintiff, Paul Robert, appeals from the judgment of the trial court awarding a lesser amount in damages on his trespass claim against the defendants, Carmen Scarlata and Wanda Bermudez, than was sought by the plaintiff. The defendants initially had pleaded a special defense of adverse possession but before the presentation of evidence, withdrew that defense and admitted that their conduct constituted a trespass. Accordingly, the sole issue...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases