1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 436 F.Supp.2d
  5. 436 F.Supp.2d 1080 (2006)
 

GENENTECH, INC. v. INSMED INCORPORATED

No. C 04-5429 CW.

436 F.Supp.2d 1080 (2006)

GENENTECH, INC., a Delaware corporation, and Tercica, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Plaintiffs, v. INSMED INCORPORATED, a Virginia corporation; Celtrix Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation; and Insured Therapeutic Proteins, a Colorado Corporation, Defendants. And Related Counterclaims.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

June 30, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

M. Patricia Thayer, Heller Ehrman White & McAuliffe LLP, San Francisco, CA, William G. Gaede, III, Andrew A. Kumamoto, Lauren J. Smith, Cooley Godward LLP, Palo Alto, CA, for Plaintiffs.

ORDER ON CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

WILKEN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs and Counterdefendants Genentech, Inc. and Tercica, Inc. and Defendants and Counterclaimants Insmed Incorporated, Celtrix Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Insmed Therapeutic Proteins, Inc. dispute the meaning of several terms arid phrases used" in: U.S. Patent No. 6,331,414 ('414 patent), U.S. Patent No. 5,187,151 (the '551 patent) and U.S. Patent. No. 5,258,287...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases