PSP v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE TROOPERS ASS'N


902 A.2d 599 (2006)

PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, Petitioner v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE TROOPERS ASSOCIATION, Respondent.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided June 30, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joanna N. Reynolds, Asst. Counsel, Harrisburg, for petitioner.

Gary M. Lightman, Harrisburg, for respondent.

BEFORE: COLINS, President Judge, and McGINLEY, Judge, PELLEGRINI, Judge, FRIEDMAN, Judge, LEADBETTER, Judge, SIMPSON, Judge, and LEAVITT, Judge.


OPINION BY Judge SIMPSON.

The Pennsylvania State Police (PSP) asks us to expand the narrow certiorari scope of review applicable to matters arising under what is commonly known as Act 111,1 to include review of those matters that are repugnant to public policy or shock the conscience of the court. We are bound by the Supreme Court's decision in Pennsylvania State Police v. Pennsylvania State Troopers Ass'n (Smith & Johnson),

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases