TURGEAU v. ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BD.

No. 05-9503.

446 F.3d 1052 (2006)

Brian M. TURGEAU, Petitioner, v. ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD, United States Department of Labor, Respondent, and The Nordam Group, Inc., Intervenor.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

April 27, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Submitted on the briefs:*

Randall D. Huggins, Jonathan E. Shook, Shook, Huggins & Johnson, P.C., Tulsa, OK, for Petitioner.

Howard M. Radzely, Steven J. Mandel, Paul L. Frieden, Joan Brenner, United States Department of Labor, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Stephen L. Andrew, D. Kevin Ikenberry, Andrew, Williams, & Ikenberry, Tulsa, OK, for Intervenor.

Before HENRY, McKAY, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.


McKAY, Circuit Judge.

This equitable tolling case revolves around one crucial legal point — that a completely preempted state law claim becomes the federal claim that Congress enacted to replace the state remedy. Respondent Department of Labor and Intervenor The NORDAM Group, Inc. have not appreciated this key point. They therefore incorrectly argue, and the Department of Labor's Administrative Review Board (ARB) incorrectly held, that petitioner Brian...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases