U.S. v. VERTAC CHEMICAL CORP.

Nos. 05-3147, 05-3153.

453 F.3d 1031 (2006)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff/Appellee, Arkansas Department of Pollution Control and Ecology, Plaintiff, v. VERTAC CHEMICAL CORPORATION, Defendant, Hercules, Inc., Defendant/Appellant, Inter-Ag Corporation; Department of Defense; Dow Chemical Corporation; Velsicol Chemical Corporation; John Does, 1-5; Chemtura Corporation, formerly known as Crompton Co., formerly known as CIE, formerly known as Uniroyal Chemical Limited, Defendants, John Doull, Ph.D., M.D.; Karl K. Rozman, Ph.D.; William J. Waddell, M.D.; K. Roger Hornbrook, Ph.D.; Daniel M. Byrd, III, Ph.D., D.A.B.T.; Robert Golden, Ph.D.; B. Frank Vincent, Ph. D.; American Council on Science and Health, Amici on behalf of Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff/Appellee, Arkansas Department of Pollution Control and Ecology, Plaintiff, v. Vertac Chemical Corporation; Hercules, Inc.; Inter-Ag Corporation; Department of Defense; Dow Chemical Corporation; Velsicol Chemical Corporation; John Does, 1-5; Defendants, Crompton Co./CIE, Defendant/Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Filed: July 13, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

W. Gordon Hamlin, Jr., argued, Atlanta, GA (V. Robert Denham, Jr., Leah J. Knowlton, Tara P. Kinney, Atlanta, Laurence H. Tribe, Jonathan S. Massey, Cambridge, MA, N.M. Norton, Little Rock, AR, James K. Logan, Overland Park Kansas, on the brief), for appellant Hercules.

Steven W. Quattlebaum, arued, Little Rock, AR (E.B. Chiles IV and Joseph Falasco, Little Rock, on the brief), for appellant Crompton.

Robert H. Oakley, Dept. of Justice, argued, Washington, D.C. (Samuel D. Blesi, Paul Schaeffer, Greer S. Goldman of the Justice Dept., Washington, D.C., Sue Ellen Wooldridge, Assistant Attorney General, Erik Swenson, EPA, Washington D.C., James L. Turner, EPA, of Dallas, TX, on the brief), for appellee.

Before WOLLMAN, FAGG, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.


WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge.

Hercules, Inc. (Hercules) and Crompton Co./Cie (Uniroyal)1 raise constitutional claims and argue that the district court2 erred in assigning and apportioning liability for environmental cleanup costs pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601-0675, as amended by...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases