1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 434 F.3d
  5. 434 F.3d 1038 (2006)
 

VAN PATTEN v. DEPPISCH

No. 04-1276.

434 F.3d 1038 (2006)

Joseph VAN PATTEN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Jodine DEPPISCH, Respondent-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided January 24, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Linda T. Coberly (argued), Winston & Strawn, Chicago, IL, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Christopher Wren (argued), Office of the Attorney General Wisconsin Department of Justice, Madison, WI, for Respondent-Appellee.

Before COFFEY, EVANS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge.

Telephone conversations with clients are a big part of what lawyers do. But can using a telephone while representing a client go too far? This habeas case presents the novel—but, in the endless quest for efficiency, perhaps inevitable—question: What does the law require when a client on the other end of a telephone hookup with his lawyer is standing before a judge, about to relinquish a bevy of important constitutional...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases