1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 847 N.E.2d
  5. 847 N.E.2d 601 (2006)
 

EADS v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORP.

No. 1-05-1895.

847 N.E.2d 601 (2006)

365 Ill. App.3d 19

301 Ill.Dec. 591

Tracie EADS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant.

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, First Division.

March 20, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roger C. Denton and J. Brad Wilmoth of Schlichter, Bogard & Denton, St. Louis, MO, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Raymond H. Groble III and Christopher R. Karsten of Daley & Mohan, P.C., Chicago, for Defendant-Appellant.

Justice McBRIDE delivered the opinion of the court:

In this permissive interlocutory appeal pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 306, the defendant, Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail), a Pennsylvania corporation, contends it was an abuse of discretion for the circuit court of Cook County to deny its motion to dismiss the Indiana plaintiff's negligence action on the basis of forum non conveniens before a retrial on the action commences in this jurisdiction. 166...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases