STATE EX REL. VAN HOUT v. ENDICOTT

No. 2004AP1192-W.

724 N.W.2d 692 (2006)

2006 WI App 196

STATE of Wisconsin ex rel. Perry VAN HOUT, Petitioner, v. Jeffrey ENDICOTT, Warden, and Redgranite Correctional Institution, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Opinion Filed September 13, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

On behalf of the petitioner, the cause was submitted on the petition of Robert R. Henak of Henak Law Office, S.C., Milwaukee.

On behalf of the respondents, a response was submitted by James M. Freimuth, assistant attorney general, and Peggy A. Lautenschlager, attorney general; and Kenneth R. Kratz, district attorney, Chilton.

Before SNYDER, P.J., BROWN and ANDERSON, JJ.


¶ 1 PER CURIAM.

Perry Van Hout, by counsel, petitions for a writ of habeas corpus under State v. Knight, 168 Wis.2d 509, 484 N.W.2d 540 (1992). Van Hout contends that he was deprived of an appeal by his appointed appellate counsel's actions and this court's decision to permit appointed appellate counsel to withdraw. Van Hout seeks reinstatement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases