DOUGLAS MEDICAL CENTER v. MERCY MED. CENTER

99CV2265CC, A118908.

125 P.3d 1281 (2006)

203 Or. App. 619

DOUGLAS MEDICAL CENTER, LLC, dba Douglas Community Medical Center, and Triad Holdings III, Inc., Appellants, v. MERCY MEDICAL CENTER, Respondent, and Roseburg Surgicenter, Inc., Professional Management of Oregon, Inc., and Dell Gray, Defendants. Roseburg Surgicenter, Inc., and Roseburg Surgicenter, Ltd., Counterclaim Plaintiffs, v. Douglas Medical Center, LLC, and Triad Holdings III, Inc., and Triad Hospitals, Inc., Counterclaim Defendants. Roseburg Surgicenter, Inc., Roseburg Surgicenter, Ltd., Professional Management of Oregon, Inc., and Dell Gray, Attorney Fees and Costs Appellants, and Mercy Medical Center, Attorney Fees and Costs Claimant below, v. Douglas Medical Center, LLC, dba Douglas Community Medical Center, and Triad Holdings III, Inc., Attorney Fees and Costs Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided January 11, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas W. Sondag, Portland, argued the cause for appellants Douglas Medical Center, LLC, dba Douglas Community Medical Center, and Triad Holdings III, Inc. With him on the opening brief was Lane Powell Spears Lubersky LLP. On the reply brief was Lane Powell PC.

Thomas W. Brown, Portland, argued the cause for respondent Mercy Medical Center. With him on the brief were Wendy M. Margolis and Cosgrave Vergeer Kester LLP.

Wm. Randolph Turnbow, Eugene, argued the cause for attorney fees and costs appellants Roseburg Surgicenter, Inc., Roseburg Surgicenter, Ltd., Professional Management of Oregon, Inc., and Dell Gray. With him on the brief was Hershner Hunter, LLP.

Thomas W. Sondag, Portland, argued the cause for attorney fees and costs respondents Douglas Medical Center, LLC, dba Douglas Community Medical Center, and Triad Holdings III, Inc. With him on the brief was Lane Powell Spears Lubersky LLP.

Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and LINDER and ROSENBLUM, Judges.


HASELTON, P.J.

Plaintiffs Douglas Medical Center, LLC, and Triad Holdings III, Inc., appeal, challenging the trial court's allowance of a directed verdict in favor of defendant Mercy Medical Center (Mercy) on their claims for intentional interference with economic relations and for misappropriation of trade secrets under the Oregon Uniform Trade Secrets Act, ORS 646.461 to 646.475. Defendants other than Mercy appeal from a supplemental judgment denying their requests...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases