1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 906 A.2d
  5. 906 A.2d 495 (2006)
 

STATE v. O'NEILL

906 A.2d 495 (2006)

388 N.J. Super. 135

STATE of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Michael A. O'NEILL, Defendant-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided September 21, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen W. Kirsch, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant (Yvonne Smith Segars, Public Defender, attorney; Mr. Kirsch, of counsel and on the brief).

Karen Fiorelli, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Zulima V. Farber, Attorney General, attorney; Ms. Fiorelli, of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges WEFING, FUENTES and GRAVES.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

GRAVES, J.A.D.

Defendant Michael A. O'Neill appeals from an order denying his motion to suppress two tape-recorded statements he made to the police. Defendant argues that the police violated his rights under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), when they allegedly used a two-stage "question-first, warn-later" interrogation technique found...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases