1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 911 A.2d
  5. 911 A.2d 484 (2006)
 

ALLEN v. WORLD INSPECTION NETWORK INT'L INC.

911 A.2d 484 (2006)

389 N.J. Super. 115

Michael ALLEN and James Allen, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. WORLD INSPECTION NETWORK INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Washington Corporation, Defendant-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 5, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John E. Glowney, Seattle, WA, (Stoel Rives) of the Washington Bar, admitted pro hac vice, argued the cause for appellant (Drinker Biddle & Reath, and Mr. Glowney, attorneys; John P. Mitchell, Walter J. Fleischer, Jr., Florham Park, and Mr. Glowney, on the brief).

Cara E. Leheny argued the cause for respondent (Wolf, Block, Schorr & Solis-Cohen, attorneys; Ms. Leheny and James Greenberg, Cherry Hill, of counsel and on the brief).

Before Judges LINTNER, S.L. REISNER and SELTZER.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

S.L. REISNER, J.A.D.

Defendant, World Inspection Network International, Inc. (WIN), appeals from a trial court order enjoining WIN from proceeding with arbitration of its dispute with plaintiffs, Michael and James Allen, in the State of Washington and requiring instead that any arbitration must take place in New Jersey. We conclude that the requirement to arbitrate in Washington is an integral part of the arbitration...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases