1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 434 F.3d
  5. 434 F.3d 956 (2006)
 

U.S. v. DAWSON

Nos. 04-2557, 04-2592.

434 F.3d 956 (2006)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pierre DAWSON and Alphonso Ingram, Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided January 17, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George W. Jackson, III (argued), Office of United States Attorney, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Joseph A. Morris (argued), Morris, Rathnau & Delarosa, Chicago, IL, Thomas A. Durkin (argued), Durkin & Roberts, Chicago, IL, Steven J. Weinberg (argued), Susan M. Pavlow, Weinberg & Rizzi, Chicago, IL, for Defendants-Appellants.

Before CUDAHY, POSNER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

POSNER, Circuit Judge.

The government has moved for rehearing, complaining about the following passage in our opinion of September 28 and more particularly about the sentence in that passage that we have italicized:

In suppression hearings in two previous cases, involving other defendants, the trial judges had disbelieved testimony by three government agents who also testified for the prosecution in our case. Defense counsel in our case wanted to use those...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases