KIM v. PACCAR FINANCIAL CORP.


896 A.2d 489 (2006)

385 N.J. Super. 142

Oksun KIM, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. PACCAR FINANCIAL CORP., Paccar Leasing Co., and Paccar, Inc., Defendants-Appellants.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 19, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph A. Deer argued the cause for appellants (Bashwiner and Deer, attorneys; Mr. Deer, on the brief).

Gregory R. Preston argued the cause for respondent (Preston & Wilkins, attorneys; Mr. Preston and Joseph Deliso, on the brief).

Before Judges FALL, PARKER and C.S. FISHER.


The opinion of the court was delivered by

FISHER, J.A.D.

In this appeal we review a choice-of-law ruling in an action for personal injury damages resulting from a New Jersey automobile accident that involved New Jersey and New York residents—a variation on the choice-of-law problem encountered in Fu v. Fu, 160 N.J. 108, 733 A.2d 1133 (1999). Guided by Fu, we conclude that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases