ROE v. CRAWFORD

No. 05-4333-CV-C-DW.

439 F.Supp.2d 942 (2006)

Jane ROE, Plaintiff, v. Larry CRAWFORD, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Missouri, Central Division.

July 18, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Chakshu Patel, Diana Kasdan, Jennifer Nevins, Talcott Camp, American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, New York City, James G. Felakos, American Civil Liberties Union of Eastern Missouri, Thomas Michael Blumenthal, Paule Camazine & Blumenthal, PC, St. Louis, MO, for Plaintiff.

Michael Pritchett, Missouri Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Defendants.


ORDER

WHIPPLE, District Judge.

Before the Court are Parties' cross-motions for summary judgment. (Does. 57 and 60). For the following reasons, Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 57) is GRANTED. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED.1

I. Factual Background

This case stems from the official policy of the Missouri Department of Corrections...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases