1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 423 F.Supp.2d
  5. 423 F.Supp.2d 958 (2006)
 

3M CO. v. INTERTAPE POLYMER GROUP, INC.

No. Civ. 03-2651JRTFLN.

423 F.Supp.2d 958 (2006)

3M COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. INTERTAPE POLYMER GROUP, INC., Central Products Company, and Intertape Polymer Corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Minnesota.

March 24, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel J. Brown and Thomas W. Tinkham, Dorsey & Whitney LLP, Minneapolis, MN, and Louis T. Pirkey, Timothy M. Kenny, and William G. Barber, Fulbright & Jaworski, Austin, TX, for Plaintiff.

Lindsay G. Arthur, Jr. and Thomas A. Forker, Arthur Chapman Kettering Smetak & Pikala, PA, Minneapolis, MN, and Scott A. King and Victoria L. Nilles, Thompson Hine LLP, Dayton, OH, for Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

TUNHEIM, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff 3M Company ("3M") has a registered trademark on the color blue used on its painter's tape. 3M alleges that defendants have infringed its trademarked blue color, and asserts claims for trademark infringement under 15 U.S.C. § 1114 and Minnesota common law, unfair competition under 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a), dilution under 15 U.S.C. § 1115(c) and Minn.Stat. §...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases