1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 893 A.2d
  5. 893 A.2d 486 (2006)
 

HEUSSNER v. DAY, BERRY AND HOWARD, LLP

No. 26461.

893 A.2d 486 (2006)

94 Conn.App. 569

Janet HEUSSNER v. DAY, BERRY AND HOWARD, LLP, et al.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Decided March 28, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John R. Williams, New Haven, for the appellant (plaintiff).

Anthony M. Fitzgerald, with whom, on the brief, was David S. Hardy, New Haven, for the appellees (named defendant et al.).

DiPENTIMA, McLACHLAN and FRANCIS X. HENNESSY, Js.

McLACHLAN, J.

The plaintiff, Janet Heussner, appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after it granted the motion for summary judgment filed by the defendants Day, Berry & Howard, LLP, and Gregory A. Hayes.1 The plaintiff claims that the court improperly concluded that the doctrine of collateral estoppel applied to preclude the relitigation of facts and issues that previously were determined in a Probate Court proceeding...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases