PER CURIAM.
Appellant asserts that the trial court reversibly erred by imposing consecutive habitual violent felony offender sentences, each with a minimum mandatory term of imprisonment, for offenses that arose from a single criminal episode. We agree as to counts III and IV. We, therefore, reverse the sentences as to those counts and remand for imposition of concurrent sentences as to counts III and IV. However, we conclude that the other offenses occurred during...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.