PER CURIAM.
The appellant challenges his convictions for possession of cannabis and cocaine. Because the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to prove his actual or constructive possession of the contraband, the trial court erred by denying his motion for judgment of acquittal. See Hill v. State,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.