MBNA AMERICA BANK, N.A. v. BOATA

No. 25788.

893 A.2d 479 (2006)

94 Conn.App. 559

MBNA AMERICA BANK, N.A. v. Teofil BOATA.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Decided March 28, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Teofil Boata, pro se, with whom, on the brief, were Stewart I. Edelstein and Carrie L. Larson, Bridgeport, for the appellant (defendant).

Jeanine M. Dumont, East Hartford, with whom, on the brief, was Corinne D. Brophy, for the appellee (plaintiff).

DiPENTIMA, HARPER and FOTI, Js.


DiPENTIMA, J.

The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the trial court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to consider a claim that an issue is not subject to arbitration if that claim is not brought within thirty days of the issuance of notice of the arbitration award. Because we conclude that, under the circumstances of this case, the court had jurisdiction to consider the claim and the defendant was entitled to a hearing on the issue of whether an agreement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases