1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 128 P.3d
  5. 128 P.3d 1241 (2006)
 

MANSOUR v. KING COUNTY

No. 55292-9-I.

128 P.3d 1241 (2006)

131 Wash.App. 255

Peter MANSOUR, Appellant, v. KING COUNTY, a municipal corporation; King County Animal Control and King County Licensing and Regulatory Services Division; and King County Board of Appeals, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

January 23, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Adam P. Karp, Bellingham, WA, for Appellant.

John R. Zeldenrust, Office of the Pros. Attorney, Seattle, WA, for Respondents.

AGID, J.

¶ 1 King County Animal Control issued an order requiring Peter Mansour to remove his dog from King County (the County) or give her up to be euthanized. The King County Board of Appeals upheld that order, and the superior court granted summary judgment for the County affirming the Board. Mansour appeals, arguing the Board hearing violated his due process rights. Procedural due process requires that Animal Control prove its case before the Board by a preponderance...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases