1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 904 A.2d
  5. 904 A.2d 464 (2006)
 

FOOD LION, INC. v. McNEILL

No. 2, September Term, 2004.

904 A.2d 464 (2006)

393 Md. 715

FOOD LION, INC. v. Daniel McNEILL.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

August 2, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David A. Skomba (Laura L. Stephens of Franklin & Prokopik, on brief), Baltimore, MD, for Appellant.

Keith R. Siskind (Michael D. Steinhardt, P.C., on brief), Glen Burnie, MD, for Appellee.

Argued before BELL, C.J., and RAKER, WILNER, CATHELL, HARRELL, BATTAGLIA and GREENE, JJ.

BELL, C.J.

The issue in this case is whether the testimony of an expert may be excluded at trial on the basis of a disclosure, made during discovery in response to interrogatories, that has neither been claimed nor determined to be a discovery violation, but that is challenged at trial as deficient for failing to provide information as required by Maryland Rule 2-402(f)(1)(A).1 We shall hold that it cannot be excluded on this basis.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases