1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 917 A.2d
  5. 917 A.2d 437 (2006)
 

IN RE ARMITAGE

No. 04-454.

917 A.2d 437 (2006)

2006 VT 113

In re Appeal of ARMITAGE et al.

Supreme Court of Vermont.

Motion for Reargument and Motion for Clarification Denied January 4, 2007.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephanie J. Kaplan, East Calais, for Appellants.

Vincent A. Paradis and Daniel P. O'Rourke of Bergeron, Paradis & Fitzpatrick, LLP, Essex Junction, for Appellees.

Present: REIBER, C.J., DOOLEY, JOHNSON, SKOGLUND and BURGESS, JJ.

¶ 1. BURGESS, J.

Interested neighbors ("neighbors") appeal an Environmental Court order granting Pittsford Enterprises, LLP and Joan S. Kelly ("applicants") a conditional use permit and site plan approval to construct a new post office in the Town of Pittsford. The proposed site is located at the intersection of Route 7 and Plains Road. In 2002, neighbors appealed the zoning board of adjustment's (ZBA) grant of a conditional use permit to the Environmental Court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases