1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 428 F.Supp.2d
  5. 428 F.Supp.2d 923 (2006)
 

WHITEHEAD v. THE NAUTILUS GROUP, INC.

No. 05-CV-4074.

428 F.Supp.2d 923 (2006)

Thomas E. WHITEHEAD, Individually, and as Class Representative on Behalf of all Similarly Situated Persons, Plaintiff v. The NAUTILUS GROUP, INC. and Nautilus Direct d/b/a Bowflex, Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Arkansas, Texarkana Division.

April 18, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John C. Goodson, Keil & Goodson, Louis Bradon Paddock, Michael B. Angelovich, Nix, Patterson & Roach, LLP, Texarkana, AR, James M. Pratt, Jr., James M. Pratt, Jr., P.A., Camden, AR, for Plaintiff.

John Jarrod Russell, Spencer F. Robinson, Ramsay, Bridgforth, Harrelson and Starling LLP, Pine Bluff, AR, for Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BARNES, District Court.

Before the Court is Plaintiff Thomas E. Whitehead's Motion to Remand. (Doc. 10) Defendants The Nautilus Group, Inc. and Nautilus Direct d/b/a Bowflex (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Nautilus") filed a response and a supplement to their response. (Does. 13 and 16) On January 27, 2006, the Court held a hearing on the motion. (Doc. 18) After the hearing, Plaintiff filed a supplement to his...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases