1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 136 P.3d
  5. 136 P.3d 1214 (2006)
 

STATE v. SIEGEL

D041803T; A127206.

136 P.3d 1214 (2006)

206 Or. App. 461

STATE of Oregon, Appellant-Cross-Respondent, v. Josiah Stephen SIEGEL, Respondent-Cross-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 14, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul L. Smith, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant-cross-respondent. With him on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General.

No appearance for respondent-cross-appellant.

Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, and SCHUMAN and ORTEGA, Judges.

SCHUMAN, J.

Approximately 18 months after receiving a citation for driving under the influence of intoxicants, defendant, not having been tried, filed a motion to dismiss on the grounds that he had not received a trial "within a reasonable period of time" in violation of ORS 135.747,1 that the state had not administered "justice * * * without delay" as required by Article I, section 10, of the Oregon Constitution,2

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases