1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 721 N.W.2d
  5. 721 N.W.2d 627 (2006)
 

PIERCE v. DIMA CORP. (1992)

No. A05-2470.

721 N.W.2d 627 (2006)

Lee A. PIERCE, Respondent, v. DIMA CORPORATION (1992), Relator, Department of Employment and Economic Development, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

October 3, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lee A. Pierce, Los Lunas, NM, pro se respondent.

Warren E. Peterson, Peterson, Fram & Bergman, St. Paul, MN, for relator.

Linda A. Holmes, Department of Employment and Economic Development, St. Paul, MN, for respondent Department.

Considered and decided by WILLIS, Presiding Judge; ROSS, Judge; and FORSBERG, Judge.

OPINION

WILLIS, Judge.

Relator employer challenges by writ of certiorari the decision of the senior unemployment-review judge (SURJ) that respondent employee did not commit employment misconduct and is not precluded from receiving unemployment benefits. Because we conclude that respondent's single violation of relator's cash-register policy did not constitute employment misconduct, we affirm.

FACTS

Relator DiMa Corporation, an adult-novelty...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases