1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 149 P.3d
  5. 149 P.3d 1194 (2006)
 

IN RE BETTIS

(OSB 05-31; SC S53231).

149 P.3d 1194 (2006)

342 Or. 232

In re Complaint as to the CONDUCT OF Wade P. BETTIS, Accused.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided December 29, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jane E. Angus, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, Lake Oswego, argued the cause for the Oregon State Bar. With her on the briefs was Jonel Ricker, Bar Counsel.

Lawrence W. Erwin, Bend, argued the cause and filed the brief for the accused.

Before DE MUNIZ, Chief Justice, and CARSON, GILLETTE, DURHAM, BALMER, and KISTLER, Justices.

PER CURIAM.

In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, the Oregon State Bar (Bar) charged the accused with violating DR 6-101(A) (failure to provide competent representation).1 A trial panel of the Disciplinary Board determined that the Bar had failed to prove that allegation and, therefore, concluded that the accused had not violated DR 6-101(A). The Bar seeks review of the trial panel decision. We review the record de novo. BR 10...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases