1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 897 A.2d
  5. 897 A.2d 438 (2006)
 

DILUZIO-GULINO v. DAIMLER CHRYSLER CORP.

897 A.2d 438 (2006)

385 N.J. Super. 434

Nicole DILUZIO-GULINO, Plaintiff-Respondent/Cross-Appellant, v. DAIMLER CHRYSLER CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Respondent, and Dodge Automotive Manufacturing, Defendant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 17, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard J. Mirra, Edison, argued the cause for appellant/ cross-respondent (Hanlon, Boglioli & Hanlon and Chase, Kurshan, Herzfeld & Rubin, attorneys; Mr. Mirra, on the brief; Michael Hoenig and Miriam Skolnik, of counsel and on the brief).

Robyn M. Gnudi, New York City, argued the cause for respondent/cross-appellant (St. John & Wayne, attorneys; Ms. Gnudi, on the brief).

Before Judges COBURN, COLLESTER and S.L. REISNER.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

COBURN, P.J.A.D.

In this products liability case, plaintiff tried to prove by expert testimony that the airbag in her car had a manufacturing defect or a design defect that caused it to deploy and injure her when it should not have deployed. When plaintiff rested, defendant moved for judgment, arguing that plaintiff's expert had failed to provide adequate evidence to support either form of defect. The judge denied...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases