NADLER v. SCHWARZENEGGER

No. C045708.

41 Cal.Rptr.3d 92 (2006)

137 Cal.App.4th 1327

Judy NADLER et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. Arnold SCHWARZENEGGER et al., Defendants and Respondents. Dean Andal et al., Plaintiffs, v. Arnold Schwarzenegger et al., Defendants. Dennis Kennedy et al., Plaintiffs, v. Arnold Schwarzenegger et al., Defendants.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

March 28, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Downey Brand, Matthew G. Jacobs and Jeffrey S. Galvin, Sacramento, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Remcho, Johansen & Purcell, Robin B. Johansen, Kathleen J. Purcell, Thomas A. Willis and Margaret R. Prinzing for Respondent California State Assembly.

Office of the Legislative Counsel, Diane F. Boyer-Vine, Marian Johnston; Olson, Hagel & Fishburn, Lance H. Olson, Sacramento, Deborah B. Caplan and Erin V. Peth for Respondent California State Senate.


SCOTLAND, P.J.

Every ten years, in the year following the year in which the national census is taken, the boundary lines of California's Senatorial, Assembly, Congressional, and Board of Equalization districts are reapportioned to, among other things, reflect population shifts. (Cal. Const., art. XXI, § 1.) Our state Constitution assigns this task to California's Legislature, with participation of the Governor through the power to approve or to veto legislation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases