1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 138 P.3d
  5. 138 P.3d 1192 (2006)
 

ANDRESANO v. COUNTY OF PIMA

No. 2 CA-CV 2005-0151.

138 P.3d 1192 (2006)

Jane ANDRESANO and Ralph Andresano, wife and husband, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. The COUNTY OF PIMA, a body politic, and Pima County Department of Public Works, a public entity, Defendants/Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department A.

June 30, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harold Hyams & Associates, P.C., By Michael J. Kuborn, Tucson, for Plaintiffs/Appellants.

Barbara LaWall, Pima County Attorney, By James M. Wilkes, Tucson, for Defendants/Appellees.

OPINION

PELANDER, Chief Judge.

¶ 1 In this personal injury-premises liability action, we are again required to interpret Arizona's recreational use immunity statute, A.R.S. § 33-1551. See, e.g., Armenta v. City of Casa Grande, 205 Ariz. 367, 71 P.3d 359 (App.2003); Herman v. City of Tucson, 197...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases