1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 901 A.2d
  5. 901 A.2d 407 (2006)
 

SOLORZANO v. SAPUNARICH

901 A.2d 407 (2006)

386 N.J. Super. 323

Andres SOLORZANO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Peter SAPUNARICH, J & S Di Feo Ford, J & S Ford, Defendants-respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 23, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John O'Dwyer argued the cause for appellant (Ginarte, O'Dwyer & Winograd, attorneys; Mr. O'Dwyer, of counsel and on the brief).

Glenn A. Montgomery argued the cause for respondents (Pollock, Montgomery & Chapin, attorneys; Mr. Montgomery, of counsel; Mr. Montgomery and Gary Ahladianakis, on the brief).

Before Judges COBURN, COLLESTER and S.L. REISNER.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

COLLESTER, J.A.D.

The narrow question presented in this appeal is whether the operator of an uninsured motor scooter is foreclosed from seeking recovery for personal injuries suffered in an accident with an automobile. The accident occurred on November 4, 2003, at the intersection of Newark and Pavonia Avenues in Jersey City. An uninsured motor scooter operated by plaintiff Andres Solorzano collided with a Ford Explorer...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases