ZOTTOLA v. THREE RIVERS SCHOOL DIST.

(FDA-01-5; CA A122463; SC S52944).

149 P.3d 1151 (2006)

342 Or. 118

Sherry ZOTTOLA, Petitioner on Review, v. THREE RIVERS SCHOOL DISTRICT and Fair Dismissal Appeals Board, Respondents on Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided December 21, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Elizabeth A. Joffe, of McKanna Bishop Joffe & Sullivan, LLP, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner on review.

Nancy Hungerford, Oregon City, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent on review Three Rivers School District.

Christina M. Hutchins, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent on review Fair Dismissal Appeals Board. With her on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General.

Before DE MUNIZ, Chief Justice, and CARSON, GILLETTE, DURHAM, and BALMER, Justices.


GILLETTE, J.

The issue in this administrative law case is whether the Fair Dismissal Appeals Board (FDAB) erred in concluding that a school district could offset certain unemployment benefits against a back-pay award that FDAB ordered the school district to pay to a wrongfully terminated employee. The Court of Appeals, in a brief per curiam opinion, affirmed the order of FDAB and, hence, the offset. Zottola v. Three Rivers School Dist., 202...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases