STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent,
v.
Donald W. THEXTON, Defendant-Appellant.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Submitted on Briefs October 18, 2006.
Opinion Filed December 6, 2006.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
On behalf of the defendant-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Kirk B. Obear of Law Offices of Barry S. Cohen, S.C. of Elkhart Lake.
On behalf of the plaintiff-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of Peggy A. Lautenschlager, Attorney General, and Jeffrey J. Kassel, Assistant Attorney General.
Before BROWN, NETTESHEIM and ANDERSON, JJ.
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.
¶ 1 BROWN, J.
In State v. Suchocki,208 Wis.2d 509, 561 N.W.2d 332 (Ct.App.1997), the defendant challenged his sentence on the basis that the author of his presentence investigation report was married to the district attorney who had prosecuted him. We held in that case that such a relationship demonstrated bias in the PSI as a matter of law. In this case, Donald W. Thexton asks...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.