PRINCE CONST. v. CONTRACT APPEALS BD.

No. 03-AA-1338.

892 A.2d 380 (2006)

PRINCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., Petitioner, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CONTRACT APPEALS BOARD, Respondent.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided February 9, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Christopher M. Kerns for petitioner. Robert A. Klimek, Jr., Washington, filed a brief for petitioner.

William J. Earl, Assistant Attorney General, with whom Robert J. Spagnoletti, Attorney General for the District of Columbia, and Edward E. Schwab, Deputy Attorney General, were on the brief for respondent.

Before WASHINGTON, Chief Judge, KRAMER, Associate Judge, and BELSON, Senior Judge.


BELSON, Senior Judge:

Prince Construction Co., Inc. (Prince), petitions for review of the ruling of the District of Columbia Contract Appeals Board (CAB or Board) that Prince was not entitled to an interest penalty under the Quick Payment Act (QPA), D.C.Code §§ 2-221.01, -221.06 (2001), on its recovery in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia of $2,506,487 against the District of Columbia. Prince challenges here the CAB ruling that, because Prince...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases