1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 451 F.3d
  5. 451 F.3d 819 (2006)
 

PANDUIT CORP. v. HELLERMANNTYTON CORP.

No. 05-1337.

451 F.3d 819 (2006)

PANDUIT CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HELLERMANNTYTON CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

June 12, 2006.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard E. Rice, Oliff & Berridge, PLC, of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were James A. Oliff, Eric W. Schweibenz, and Vu Q. Bui. Of counsel on the brief were Patrick G. Burns, Greer, Burns & Crain, Ltd., of Chicago, Illinois, and Robert A. McCann, Panduit Corporation, of Tinley Park, Illinois.

Joseph A. Kromholz, Ryan, Kromholz & Manion, S.C., of Milwaukee, Wisconsin, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was Daniel R. Johnson.

Before MICHEL, Chief Judge, GAJARSA, and LINN, Circuit Judges.

LINN, Circuit Judge.

Panduit Corporation ("Panduit") appeals from a final order dismissing its claims with prejudice after the district court granted HellermannTyton Corporation's ("HellermannTyton") motion for summary judgment that HellermannTyton did not breach provisions of the Settlement Agreement that ended a prior infringement suit involving U.S. Patent No. 5,998,732 ("the '732 patent"). See Panduit Corp. v. HellermannTyton Corp., No. 03 C 8100 (N.D.Ill...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases