MEADS v. BEST OIL CO.

No. A06-966.

725 N.W.2d 538 (2006)

Charles E. MEADS, Appellant, v. BEST OIL COMPANY d/b/a the Little Stores, et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

December 19, 2006.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles B. Bateman, Nicole R. Weinand, Reyelts, Leighton, Bateman, Hylden & Sturdevant, Ltd., Duluth, MN, for appellant.

Thomas F. Andrew, Brown, Andrew & Signorelli, P.A., Duluth, MN, for respondents.

Considered and decided by TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge; MINGE, Judge; and HUDSON, Judge.


OPINION

MINGE, Judge.

Appellant challenges the district court's grant of summary judgment denying his claim against respondents1 for discriminatory refusal to hire. Appellant asserts the district court erred in determining that (1) there was no genuine issue of material fact whether respondent's justification for not hiring appellant was pretextual; and (2) relief for employment discrimination...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases